You thought it was over

If you read this blog, you might have noticed that I haven’t mentioned UNC, Tar Heels, Chapel Hill or even basketball in a while. If you were glad about that, I’m sorry, because it’s going to be starting up again in the next couple of months. Today, UNC released their basketball schedule for 2009-’10.

The first legit game is Nov. 19 vs. Ohio State. Sorry, Buckeyes. We may have lost some talent, but this is not your year to beat us.

The “mouth water-ers” on the list include a rematch of the national championship game against Michigan State on Dec. 1, a game versus Calipari’s uglier shade of blue (Kentucky) on Dec. 5. and the first basketball game to be played in the new Dallas Cowboys stadium against Texas on Dec. 19.

Not sure how we’re going to fair against those next three. I guess it’s only fair we let a Michigan State team (who is probably going to be damn good) come play us in Chapel Hill. After all, we did let them have it at their home twice last year.

The Kentucky game is a toss up. UK has some great talent, although (other than Patrick Patterson) it’s largely unproven talent. Their freshman John Wall is supposedly one-and-done good, like he-would-have-gone-straight-to-the-NBA-if-he-could good. I wonder what kind of strings Calipari, or his stooge Worldwide Wes, had to pull to get him. In case it doesn’t become crystal clear over the next few months, I hate Coach Cal.

The Texas game will be yet another test of the Heels’ mettle in December. By the time ACC season starts we should have a pretty good idea of what kind of team we’ll be this year. Yes, I said “we.” I can’t help it.

Now the waiting, with football to help pass some of the time.

Franklin Street Pictures

I went back to Chapel Hill to watch the Final Four. Needless to say, debauchery ensued.

Check out more here.

Tar Heels back in Final Four

So, by now no longer big news, as it’s about 20 hours old, the Tar Heels will be making a return trip to the Final Four this year. The old class ring trick (UNC has never lost when I wear my class ring) worked over Oklahoma, who only hit two of 19 attempted 3-pointers in a 12-point loss. 

They will be joined by Villanova, arguably the hottest team in the tourney, Michigan State, who beat the overall No. 1 seed Louisville, and Connecticut, who many had No. 2 to UNC at the beginning of the season. 

The FF will not be lacking in tradition or storylines. UNC has been to more Final Fours and has more NCAA tournament wins than any other program.

Connecticut has never lost in the Final Four under Jim Calhoun. Even though some questionable recruiting practices have come to light recently, that won’t have an effect on this weekend. The other times UConn won the championship they were coming out of the West Regional, just like this year. 

Michigan State has been to more Final Fours in the past 11 seasons that any other program (UNC is No. 2 with four to their five, just pointing that out). And also the Spartans will be playing in their home state — at Ford Field where UNC trounced them by 30 earlier this year. 

And then there’s Villanova, back to the FF for the first time since they won it all in 1985, their only championship. So in my lifetime, they’ve never been. 

I like the way the Heels will matchup against Villanova — though to be fair I liked the way Pitt matched up against them, too. We should be able to pound inside and control tempo. And after the defense stepped it up against Oklahoma, I like our chances. 

UConn/Michigan State is a tough one. Both teams bring a lot of toughness, and playing in their home state will give a lift to the Spartans. For the theatre, I’d take either one getting to the final. If it’s MSU, then they will have that same home crowd going crazy. If it’s UConn, then it will be the exact matchup people have been talking about seeing all year. 

It’s kind of a moot point though, because the Heels are going to be winning it all! (Cue Dicky V singing Motown and staring at the camera like he has dementia)

Madness I say

Discussion of all other topics besides Tar Heel basketball is now banned from the wom until further notice…OK maybe not ALL. This is not to say I won’t talk about something else, but that I’ll try to work in something about the Heels into every post for the next two weeks.

Anyway, after a weekend in which my bracket might as well be torn to shreds, the Heels did not fall victim to upset despite some hairy moments in the LSU game in the second round. Thank God Ty Lawson is back.

The wom’s upset picks were so close I could smell the office pool jackpot, but now those picks are putting me in the middle-lower part of the pack. Here was my downfall:

Arizona:  While Arizona probably has better talent than Utah State,  I figured their poor finish in the regular season would carry over and had them losing in the first round. Said poor finish did not carry over, and they are now in the Sweet 16, robbing me of two bracket wins.

Cleveland State: They got me good. Not only did I have them losing to Wake in the first round, but I had Wake in the Final Four. It wasn’t even close. The Rams dominated the Demon Deacons

Southern Cal: I had the Trojans over Maryland, but also had them beating Michigan State. They lost a nail-biter, eventually by five points, after leading for most of the game. Thanks, guys.

Utah State: Without Dominic James, I had planned for the Marquette Golden Eagles to fall in the first round, to no avail. Utah State lost by one. Another round of thank-yous.

Florida State: The team that beat UNC in the ACC tourney. I had them in the Sweet 16 on grounds they would eat up Wisconsin from the what-I-thought-was-a-weak Big 10 and then do similarly over Xavier, who plays in the somewhat good A10. Nope. ‘Noles lose to Badgers by two. Another two victories I won’t see.

VCU: This was the great pick! I mean c’mon. UCLA, who had not looked that good and was coming out of the unconvincing Pac-10, against a well-coached VCU team with the same star guard, Eric Maynor, that beat Duke two years ago? I filled it in right away – VCU over UCLA. VCU goes down by one.

Western Kentucky: A very similar team, with many of the same players, to last year’s Sweet 16 team. I was definitely taking them over Illinois, which they did accomplish, and tried to flex superior knowledge and pick them over Gonzaga as well. One last-second layup later, they were bounced by two points. Great D on that last play Hilltoppers. Y’all WERE my boys!

 

Clemson: Oh, this one’s the best. Given I see them play in the ACC fairly often, I was going to give them the benefit of a doubt this year. Finally, Clemson was going to pull it out and perform decently in the Big Dance. Similar to the way I predicted Fla. State, I had Clemson in the Sweet 16, upsetting Oklahoma no less. Guess the Tigers will just have to wail til next year. They didn’t get out of the first round.

So by a combined 11 points (with five of those from one game), I lost out on six games that I picked in my brackets, the games those picks actually lost and any future-round games that I might have had them winning. So as far as the office pool(s) [I'm in two] I guess I’ll be waiting til next March like most of the teams in this post.

One pick is still intact though, mostly becaus they now have the ACC’s all-time leading scorer on their team, Tyler Hansbrough. Suck it, JJ!

HEELS ALL THE WAY!